Legal Opinion

Arnesman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1989No. 88-02043PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence resulting from his nolo contendere plea to the charge of carrying a concealed firearm in violation of section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1987). Appellant entered his nolo plea after the court denied his motion to suppress and his motion to dismiss. In entering his plea, appellant specifically reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motions which the appellee, State of Florida, had agreed were disposi-tive.

While we agree that any error in not suppressing the fruits of the search of appellant would be dispositive of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. United States v. Henry E. HerzbrunCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. United States v. Angel Lopez-PagesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Oishi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The State of Florida v. Andre AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API