Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. v. Fahner
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SHADUR, District Judge.
By their Second Amended Complaint and accompanying emergency motion, Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. (“Bionic”) and its several co-plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from:(1) enforcing various provisions of 111. Rev.Stat. ch. 95V2, the Illinois Vehicle Code (the “Code”), and Rule 5-401A promulgated under the Code;(2) entering plaintiffs’ business premises without warrant and making seizures of plaintiffs’ merchandise or business records; and(3) entering plaintiffs’ business premises…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. v. Tyrone C. FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- People v. MadisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. KrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.