Legal Opinion

Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. v. Fahner

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 6, 1981No. 80C3696PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SHADUR, District Judge.

By their Second Amended Complaint and accompanying emergency motion, Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. (“Bionic”) and its several co-plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from:(1) enforcing various provisions of 111. Rev.Stat. ch. 95V2, the Illinois Vehicle Code (the “Code”), and Rule 5-401A promulgated under the Code;(2) entering plaintiffs’ business premises without warrant and making seizures of plaintiffs’ merchandise or business records; and(3) entering plaintiffs’ business premises…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bionic Auto Parts and Sales, Inc. v. Tyrone C. FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. People v. MadisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. KrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API