Legal Opinion

People v. Moye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catterson, J.

In this case, we vacate a conviction and remand for a new trial because the prosecutor’s conduct at trial amounted to an egregious violation of the unsworn witness rule. The form and substance of the prosecutor’s summation whereby he injected himself, his pretrial conduct and his credibility into the proceedings were highly prejudicial to the defendant, and constituted prosecutorial misconduct that the trial judge impermissibly allowed over objection. We do not agree with the dissent’s viewpoint, characterizing the People’s summation as a “vigorous” response…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. LovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MoyeNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. DickersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. RingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API