Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1990No. 90-1508Published

1Per curiam

Although we affirm the denial of defendant's motion to suppress, see Quevedo v. State, 554 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), we remand for correction of the judgment of conviction. The judgment states that defendant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere and the court adjudicated him guilty of burglary of a conveyance, grand theft and possession of cocaine; however, the transcripts of the hearings on the motions to dismiss and to suppress reflect that the trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the burglary and grand theft charges. Upon remand the trial court should conform the judgment to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quevedo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API