Legal Opinion

Wainwright Trust Co. v. Dulin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1918No. 9,935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Hamilton Circuit Court; Ernest E. Gloe, Judge. Proceedings in the matter of the receivership of the Hamilton Trust Company. A claim by the Wainwright Trust Company, as guardian of Matilda Eouls, filed with the receiver, John S. Dulin, was allowed as a general claim and disallowed as a preferred claim, and claimant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

The undisputed facts disclosed by the record necessary to an understanding of the question presented by this appeal are in substance as follows:

In October, 1910, the Hamilton Circuit Court appointed the Hamilton Trust Company, of Noblesville, Indiana, guardian of Matilda Eouls, a person of unsound mind. Said trust company qualified as such guardian and acted as such until in -January, 1915, when it was closed as insolvent. It was never required to give and never gave any bond for the discharge of its duties as such guardian. John L. Dulin was appointed and qualified as receiver of said trust…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Potter v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Young v. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Fletcher v. SharpeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Henkel v. . Carnegie Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Terre Haute Trust Co. v. Scott, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API