Legal Opinion
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wooten & Kimbrough
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 3, 1895No. 950PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAINEY, Associate Justice.
One Burtie Johnson was injured by the appellant railway company, which injury was alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of said railway company. Subsequently, on July 12, 1893, the following contract was entered into between said Johnson and appellees herein, to wit:
“The State oe Texas, )
“County of Dallas. f
“This memorandum and contract, made and entered into this day by and between Charles F. Clint, T. T. Vander Hoeven, and Wooten & Kimbrough (a firm composed of Dudley G. Wooten and W. C. Kimbrough), attorneys and counselors at law, parties of the first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- G. H. & S. A. R. R. v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Browne v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- McCloskey v. San Antonio Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Marketing on Hold, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Davidson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.