Legal Opinion

Krings v. Garfield Cty. Bd. of Equal.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2013No. S-12-623PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 352 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS determine whether the sentencing court abused its discretion in considering and applying the relevant factors as well as any applicable legal principles in determining the sentence to be imposed.35 The sentences imposed in this case were within the statutory limits, and there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court. [13] Dixon also argues that the robbery sentence should have been ordered to be served concurrently to the sexual assault sentence, for the reasons that both relied on the same fact pattern and the robbery was ancillary to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PangbornNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. StartNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Banner County v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kearney Convention Center, Inc. v. Buffalo County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Brenner v. BANNER COUNTY BD. OF EQUAL.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Harold Warp Pioneer Village Found. v. EwaldNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. MoserNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Shepard v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Lancaster Cty. Bd. of Equal. v. MoserNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API