Legal Opinion

United States v. Manno

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 13, 1954No. 53 CR 421-422PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The defendant Thomas Manno has moved to dismiss indictment 53 CR 421. The defendants Thomas Manno and Samuel Pardy, by motion and amended motion, have moved to dismiss indictment 53 CR 422.

The defendants Nick Manno, Sam Manno and Fred Manno have moved to dismiss indictment 53 CR 421 and to suppress and order the return of evidence.

The indictment in 53 CR 421 is against Nick, Sam, Fred and Thomas Manno, containing 16 counts charging violation of Section 145(b), 26 U.S.C. This indictment was returned June 22, 1953. The indictment in general charges wilful and fraudulent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Salvatore Granello, A/K/A Sally Burns, and Hyman Levine, A/K/A George LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. United States v. William F. RickenbackerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. One 1985 Mercedes, and Kenneth Robert Glenn, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API