Legal Opinion

In re Dietz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 16, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On motion to vacate order granting bankrupt’s application for discharge.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This is an application to vacate the discharge of the bankrupt granted on July 19, 1899, on the ground that it was corruptly procured by the payment of $200 to an opposing creditor as a consideration for withdrawing his objections to the discharge.

The adjudication was made on the bankrupt’s voluntary petition on February 25, 1899. Seven creditors proved claims. Among them was the petitioners’ for the amount of $4,029.91 and a claim of Feigenbaum & Schweiger for $1,690.37. Max Schweiger, a partner in the last-named firm, was chosen trustee by the creditors, the present…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blasdel v. FowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Bell v. . LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Tuxbury v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  4. In re DouglassDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Ex parte BriggsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re LevyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. In re SiegelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  3. In re ReigelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  4. In re SanbornDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API