Legal Opinion

City of Fairfield v. McRoberts

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1995No. CA94-07-153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William W. Young, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Jack R. McRoberts, appeals an order of the Fairfield Municipal Court finding him guilty of menacing in violation of Fairfield City Ordinance 537.06(a). 1

As there is no transcript of proceedings, the record consists of the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, which reflect that on April 8, 1994, appellant’s former wife, Karen McRoberts, telephoned appellant “from Fairfield, Ohio, and spoke to [appellant] who was in Milford, Ohio. During that telephone conversation, [appellant] made threats to Mrs. McRoberts. Specifically,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StutzOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Franklin v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Franklin v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. MayhanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API