Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Arif
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1051Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly directed the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (hereinafter MVAIC) to interpose an answer to the complaint (see Insurance Law § 5214; see generally Tirado v Miller, 75 AD3d 153 [2010]). MVAIC’s contention that the plaintiffs motion should have been denied because he failed to comply with Insurance Law § 5208, is raised for the first time on appeal and, thus, is not properly before this Court (see Luciano v Our Lady of Sorrows School, 79 AD3d 705 [2010]; Spagnole v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp., 77 AD3d 816 [2010]; Matter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tirado v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Insurance of North America v. KaplunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Luciano v. Our Lady of Sorrows SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Spagnole v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daley v. PelzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Archer v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Archer v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Daley v. PelzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Eisenhauer v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.