Legal Opinion

Deering v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Stevens county, Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

When this cause was called for trial, the defendant, upon an intimation of the district court that his answer was insufficient, asked leave to amend, which was granted upon condition that he stipulate to try the cause before a referee if plaintiff desired. Defendant excepted to this condition, but afterwards amended his answer, and entered into a stipulation for the appointment of W. C. Bieknell as referee to “hear, try, and determine the action.” This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the referee’s report, and for a new trial. Conceding, in defendant’s favor,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Gondreau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API