Legal Opinion

Polynice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1990No. 88-3333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge.

Appellant seeks a new trial because the jury foreman was the step father of one of the state witnesses. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

During voir dire, a prospective juror, C.E. Harvey, informed the court that his step son was one of the police officers on the state’s witness list.- He also mentioned that he had a second son in law enforcement. The trial judge denied defense counsel’s motion to excuse Mr. Harvey for cause. Out of peremptory challenges, appellant asked for an additional one, but the trial judge refused to grant the request. Mr. Harvey became a member of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sydleman v. BensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Denmark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Kraig Alexander Williams v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API