Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Plogger v. Myers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2017No. 105210Published

1Concurrence

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCURRING:

{¶ 15} I concur with the majority's conclusion that the trial court's motion in limine ruling does not constitute a final determination on the issue of attorney-client privilege, and therefore, is not a final, appealable order. As referenced by the majority, this court has held that

"the granting or denial of a motion in limine is a tentative, interlocutory, precautionary ruling reflecting the trial court's anticipatory treatment of an evidentiary issue which the trial court may change at trial when the disputed evidence appears in context." State v. Taylor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Liebe v. Admin., Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API