Legal Opinion
Richfield City v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 26, 1990No. 890156-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFF, Judge:
Defendant James M. Walker appeals from his conviction of being in actual physical control of a vehicle while having a blood alcohol level of .21%, in violation of Rich-field City Ordinance 1983-2. We affirm.
At a bench trial, the following facts were stipulated to by the parties. In the early morning hours of June 30, 1987, defendant drove to the Richfield Quality Inn, seeking a room. After being informed that there were no vacancies, he returned to his truck in the parking lot and went to sleep. Subsequently, he was discovered by a Sevier County sheriffs deputy, who found…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. GhylinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SmelterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. SchulerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WheelerHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. RaskNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. PrawittCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.