Legal Opinion

New Haven & Fort Wayne Turnpike Co. v. Bird

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APEAL from the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

This case comes here on a finding of the facts and the conclusions- of law upon them, under section 341 of the- code.

This was a proceeding in the court below to enjoin the collection of an assessment made on the lauds of the plaintiff to aid in the construction of a gravel road under the act of March 11th, 1867, Acts of 1867i p..l6T.

The facts found by the court are substantially as follows v.

Eirst. That the plaintiff was-the owner of the lot in the city of Fort Wayne, described in' the complaint, and was charged on the tax duplicate for the year 1867,. with the-sum of sixty-seven cents,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Parsons v. Pendleton & Fishersburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Scott v. Mount Auburn & Marietta Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SpringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883
  5. Forgey v. Northern Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API