Legal Opinion

Clear Creek Township v. Rittger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1895No. 1,322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, C. J. —

The appellee brought this action against the appellant to recover the sum of sixty dollars, which he alleged had been assessed in his favor under section 6830, R. S. 1894 (section 1558, E. S.), for gravel needed by the supervisor and to be used in the repair of the highways of said township.

Pending the formation of the issues on the complaint, one Aseal Brookover was, at his own request, made a party defendant.

The appellee now insists that the appeal be dismissed for the reason that said Aseal Brookover is not a party to this appeal. The judgment appealed from was in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gourley v. EmbreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Garside v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Burk v. SimonsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Braden v. LeibenguthIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Manufacturing Co. v. AngemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Elwood State Bank v. MockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Mikels v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Allen v. GarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API