Legal Opinion

Gaines v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1926No. 8 Div. 429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Under the rules of evidence obtaining in this state fixed by our decisions, as well as by statute, we are bound to hold that there was sufficient evidence in this case upon which the trial judge could reach a conclusion of guilt. Code 1923, § 4650; Coggins v. State, 20 Ala. App. 378, 102 So. 241.

Giving the findings of the trial judge the presumptions to which they are entitled under the law, we also hold that the trial j udge did not commit error in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial. Coggins’ Case, supra:

Recognizing the persuasive argument of appellant’s counsel, we still hold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Reese v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Roseberry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Coggins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Streanger v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Durham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API