Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Humphrey

¶ 132. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I respectfully dissent from the level of discipline imposed by the court. If this case involved nothing more than a disagreement among justices about whether an attorney should receive a public reprimand or a relatively brief suspension, there would be little to discuss. But the case involves much more. In *572my view, the handling of this case has been so irregular that it is unfair to the attorney and seriously undermines confidence in the lawyer regulation system, especially the actions of this court.

¶ 133. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR)…