Webber v. State

1. The general rule is, that in charging lareency after trust, the ownership of the property alleged to have heen fraudulently converted may be described as that of the real owner, or the person in possession, as bailee or agent; and such bailee or agent, may be described as the owner, individually by name, without describing his trust character. 2 Wharton’s Criminal Procedure (10th ed.) 1221, § 861. As to partnerships, see Buffington v. State, 124 Ga. 24 (52 S. E. 19); Lee v. State, 62 Ga. App. 556, 558 (8 S. E. 2d, 706).

2. Where, in a case of larceny after trust, the property entrusted to…