Legal Opinion

Eelkema v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1943No. 33,639PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This case comes here on a writ of prohibition which the relator seeks to have made absolute. The question presented is whether-relator has acquired tenure under the teachers tenure law. Minn. St. 1941, §§ 130.22 to 130.32 (Mason St. 1927, §§ 2935-1 to 2935-13). He was superintendent of schools of the independent school district of Duluth from August 1, 1936, until July 31, 1943, under two successive three-year contracts and a one-year contract. The school board of the district refuses to reneiv his contract or to continue his employment. He contends that the tenure law applies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Jensen v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 85Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. McNely v. Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 7Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Chiodo v. Board of Education of Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Biehn v. TessAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Seyfang v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF WASHAKIE, ETC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API