Legal Opinion

Polisky v. Puget Sound Electric Railway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1922No. 16854Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered April 28, 1921, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action in tort.

1Per curiam

— This is a personal injury action. There was a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The first three assignments of error relate to instructions to the jury, to which no exceptions were taken. Under our uniform holdings they will not he reviewed upon appeal. Worthy v. Arctic Co., 114 Wash. 435, 195 Pac. 222. The’other three assignments of error are that the instructions as a whole are inconsistent, that the court erred in denying the motion for a new trial, and erred in entering judgment upon the verdict. They are in no way argued in the briefs. However,' upon an examination of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worthy v. Arctic Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API