Legal Opinion

Dahl v. United Technologies Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 8, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-363 to 78-366PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

These civil actions were filed in this Court on August 23, 1978 by four Norwegian residents (collectively, the “plaintiffs”) 1 as personal representatives of four Norwegian decedents who died in a crash of a Norwegian owned and operated helicopter in Norwegian territorial waters of the North Sea on November 23, 1977. 2 The named defendant in each case is United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”), a Delaware corporation, which maintains its principal place of business in Hartford, Connecticut. 3 UTC manufactured and sold the helicopter involved in the crash. 4…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maria Arlete Vaz Borralho v. Keydril Company, Key International Drilling Company, Ltd. And Key Perfuracoes Maritimas, Ltda.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Dahl v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Harrison v. Wyeth Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Bombay, Etc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1982
  5. Fosen v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API