Legal Opinion · Dissent

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Little v. Rhay

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 1973No. 629-3Published

1DissentGreen, C.J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. In my judgment, the majority opinion nullifies RCW 7.36.120; further, it prohibits the use of affidavits in reaching decisions on writs of habeas corpus contrary to Somday v. Rhay, 67 Wn.2d 180, 406 P.2d 931 (1965) and Little v. Rhay, 68 Wn.2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, cert. denied, 385 U. S. 96, 17 L. Ed. 2d 196, 87 S. Ct. 331 (1966). Further, the decision will require a full evidentiary hearing every time a petitioner makes a bare, uncorroborated allegation that he has been denied a constitutional right, even though the allegation is conclusively controverted by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In RE LITTLE v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In RE SOMDAY v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In RE SCRUGGS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Little v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API