Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Dover Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 16, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Harry Franlcel and others against the Dover Manufacturing Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered by default in the Municipal Court. The defendant is a foreign corporation, and service of the summons was made upon one Kaderly. The defendant contends that such service was invalid, and asks that upon this ground the judgment be reversed. There was no general appearance by the defendant in the court below, and this appeal is properly taken, under the provisions of section 311 of the Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1578, c. 580). Dixon v. Carrucci (Sup.) 97 N. Y. Supp. 380; Hodge v. Acorn Brass Mfg. Co., 50 Misc. Rep.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Coler v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Dixon v. CarrucciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  4. Mears v. North American Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Doherty v. Evening Journal Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bodnar v. Coplay Cement Manufacing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API