Bay v. Funk
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Pierron, J.:
Brian Bay, plaintiff, appeals from the district court decision granting summary judgment to defendant Michael Funk. Bay claims there are disputed questions of material fact that make this case unsuitable for summary judgement. We affirm.
On December 20, 1990, Brian Bay was employed as a security guard for Midwest Security Systems. Bay was under contract to Exide Corporation. Bay’s job duties included inspecting trucks leaving the plant. To accomplish this inspection, the truck would pull over to the far right-hand side of the road, and Bay would walk around the truck to inspect the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
- Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Wells v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Messenger v. Sage Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Chapman v. Victory Sand & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scott Ex Rel. Administrator v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Chapman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Boucher v. Peerless Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Chapman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Servantez v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004