Legal Opinion

Herrmann v. City of East St. Louis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for damages sustained by the erection of a viaduct. In the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon, Alexander W. Hope, Judge, presiding. Declaration in case; plea of not guilty; trial by jury; verdict of not guilty; error by plaintiff. Heard in this court at the August term, 1894,

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scofield

delivered the'opinion of the Court.

Henry and John Herrmann sued the city of East St. Louis in an action on the case for damages to their property, situated in that city, arising from the construction of a viaduct in and over the street in front of their property for the use of the traveling public in crossing Cahokia creek and certain railroad tracks. The viaduct in front of the property in question was eighteen feet above the grade of the street and thirty-six feet wide, and was calculated to cut off free access to the property and in many other ways to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. City of Bloomington v. PollockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Page v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Washington Ice Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Village of North Alton v. DorsettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  2. Butler v. City of East St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API