Legal Opinion

Edmisten v. Smith & Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9152Published

Error to Alamosa District Court, Hon. Jesse C. Wiley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Garrigues

July 12, 1915, the Emporium Stores Company, a Colorado corporation, was indebted to defendant in error for goods, wares and merchandise purchased between June 24 and December 18, 1914. The corporation failed to file the annual report required by chapter 102, page 254, Laws 1911, within 60 days next after January 1, 1915, but did file such report April 8, 1915. This suit, commenced July 12, 1915, is based upon the statute to enforce against Edmisten the collection of the debt, he being a director of the corporation.

*2It is claimed, inasmuch as no default existed when the indebtedness was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Reuter Hub & Spoke Co. v. HicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hazelton v. PorterColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Thatcher v. SalomonColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Bradford v. GulleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API