Legal Opinion

Luedtke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 4, 2009No. 2D06-4580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Randal J. Luedtke appeals his judgment and sentence, challenging the court’s denial of his presentence motion to withdraw plea. We agree with Mr. Luedtke that his trial counsel’s incorrect advice regarding possible civil commitment consequences under the Jimmy Ryce Act 1 constituted good cause sufficient to permit Mr. Luedtke to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing. We accordingly reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In February 2006, the State filed an amended information charging Mr. Luedtke with one count of sexual battery under section 794.011(5), Florida…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watrous v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Onnestad v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LEHMKUHLE v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. CHANNING ALBERTO STEWART v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API