Legal Opinion

De Salvo v. Doll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 18, 1946No. 37875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Plaintiff instituted this suit to annul and set aside a contract to purchase certain real estate and to recover the amount deposited to bind said contract together with certain expenses incurred by him thereunder. Defendant admitted the execution of the contract and the making of the deposit, and reconvened for specific performance. The district court rendered judgment for plaintiff as prayed for and dismissed defendant’s reconventional demand at his costs. From this judgment defendant has appealed.

The material facts are as follows:

Plaintiff, Anthony De Salvo, joined by his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. FreyhanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  4. Lavillebeuvre v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  5. Barton v. KirkmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. Morrison v. FineranLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Papalia v. HartsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Young v. StevensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Young v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API