Legal Opinion

Bartko v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 17, 2017No. 14-1070PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Between 2004 and 2005, Gregory Bart-ko masterminded a wide-ranging scheme that sought to defraud investors through the sale of securities. Five years later, Bartko was convicted of conspiracy, selling unregistered securities and mail fraud. Shortly thereafter, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) instituted a follow-on administrative proceeding against him. In that proceeding, the Commission, inter alia, permanently barred Bartko from associating with six classes of securities market participants. 1

Bartko’s petition…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bartko v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Nunnally v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Bellagio, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Belize Bank Limited v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API