Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hines

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 9, 2018No. 16–P–1592Published

1Opinion of the Court

After a jury trial, the defendant, James W. Hines, was convicted of trafficking in an opium derivative, G. L. c. 94C, § 32E(c ) ; trafficking in an opium derivative in a drug-free school zone, G. L. c. 94C, § 32J ; and unlawful possession of an electric stun gun, G. L. c. 140, § 131J. On appeal, the parties agree that the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the defendant's confrontation rights were violated when a substitute chemist read language from drug certificates prepared by another chemist into the record at trial. Having determined that the defendant's confrontation rights…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BrzezinskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. GreinederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API