Legal Opinion
Acuity v. SD Framing LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 16, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00031Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Acuity, a mutual insurance company, No. CV-25-00031-PHX-DLR 9 Plaintiff, 10 ORDER v. 11 12 SD Framing, LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company, 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Acuity moves for default judgment against Defendant SD Framing, LLC 18 (“SD”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). (Doc. 11 at 1.) SD failed to file 19 a response, and the time for filing has passed. For the reasons stated below, default 20 judgment is appropriate. 21 I. Background 22 SD is a limited liability company…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Fair Housing of Marin, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Jack Combs, D.B.A. Waters Edge ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wecosign, Inc. v. IFG Holdings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.