Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Fredericks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
1. The plaintiff in error, the defendant in the trial court, relies upon two grounds in support of its position that no verdict against it was authorized. The first ground is that there was no evidence to support the allegations of the petition that the defendant operated the store where the plaintiff was injured. The brief of the plaintiff in error states in part: “The defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., called as its only witness the manager of its store on Central Avenue in Augusta, Georgia.” “This statement has not been controverted by defendants in error ... so,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Candler v. Automatic Heating Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Veal v. RinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- DeVane v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Fleming v. Wal-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Cox v. K-Mart Enterprises of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Stapp v. Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.