Legal Opinion

In re Albany Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We regard this proceeding as certiorari to review the determination of a subordinate tribunal and not as an original application under section 9 of the Railroad Law (as amd. by Laws of 1928, chap. 546; formerly section 59, as added by Laws of 1892, chap. 676, and amd. by Laws of 1895, chap. 545). The petitioner has interpreted the remedy for itself by adopting the form and practice of certiorari and by failing to adopt the form and practice of an original application by its directors for an order directing the Public Service Commission to issue a certificate of public convenience and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. City of Rochester v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Matter of City of Long Beach v. P.S. Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. In re the Application of the Directors of the Rochester, Corning, Elmira Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Co-Operative Dairymen of Fraser, New York, Inc. v. Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API