Legal Opinion

Tate v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The appeal is prosecuted from an order of the Superior Court denying the petition of the Southern Eailway Company for a removal of the cause to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina.

When a motion to remove a cause is made on the ground of a separable controversy, the plaintiff may have the question heard and determined upon the allegations in his complaint and the requisite separability does not exist if according to such allegations the defendants are jointly liable. R. R. v. Thompson, 200 U. S., 206, 50 L. Ed., 441; R. R. v. Miller, 217 U. S.,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Sharp v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Cain v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. North Carolina Ass'n of Licensed Detectives v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Clevenger v. . GroverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Hughes v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API