Legal Opinion
Trimble v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1911No. 9523PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered January 11, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendant, confirming an assessment against property benefited by a local improvement, after a hearing before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of King county, confirming an assessment against certain leasehold interests in first-class tide lands. The leases were issued under the acts of 1897 as amended in 1899. They were executed in 1899. In the legislative act of 1905, Laws 1905, p. 267, § 1, it was provided that:
“All leasehold, contractual or possessory interests in any tide lands owned by the state of Washington in fee simple (in trust or otherwise), situated within the limits of any incorporated city or town in this state, and which have been leased by the state, or which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Wells v. SavannahSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Moeller v. GormleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Rabel v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oklahoma Industries Authority v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Folsom v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Pier 67, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Chief Seattle Properties, Inc. v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Kootenai County v. Seven-Seven Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.