Legal Opinion

Arceneaux v. Louisiana

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 1964No. 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, who was before the state court “on a charge of vagrancy,” 1 raised several objections to a denial of a preliminary hearing. The third of these reads as follows:

“. . . that the bill of information charges no offense known to law and if it charges an offense within the meaning and intentment [sic] of a Louisiana statute, then both the statute and the bill of information are unconstitutional, null, and void, as being violative of the guaranties contained in the United States Constitution and of the Louisiana Constitution and Laws; . . .”

Louisiana Rev. Stat. § 15:154 provides that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eastman v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Polakow's Realty Experts, Inc. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miletich v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. United States ex rel. Bland v. NennaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. State v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API