Legal Opinion

Ohio Water Service Co. v. City of Washington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1936No. 25311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

From the foregoing statement it is to be observed that but one question of law is presented by the demurrer to the petition and that is whether the ordinance in question falls within the requirements of Section 5625-33 (d), General Code. The pertinent provisions of this statute are as follows:

“No subdivision or taxing unit shall * * * make any contract or give any order involving expenditure of money unless there is attached thereto a certificate of the fiscal officer of the subdivision that the amount required to meet the same (or in the case of a continuing contract to be performed in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
  2. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County v. Board of Township Trustees of Island Creek TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. City of Norwalk v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API