Scheske v. University of Michigan Health System
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge,
This Title VII retaliation case arises out. of Plaintiff Joan Scheske’s employment at Defendant University of Michigan Health System. Plaintiff argues that she was terminated in retaliation for raising gender discrimination concerns in a presentation to a supervisor. Defendant argues that Plaintiffs presentation was not a protected activity under Title VII. For the reasons stated below, this Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgement and DISMISSES Plaintiffs complaint with prejudice.
I. Facts
A.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anita Karlsson v. Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Arréal Green v. Roush Holdings, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Baker v. Ferris State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Brown v. FCA US LLC/StellantisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Coffee v. Bullitt CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.