Johnston Bros. v. McConnell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Contracts. Promissory notes. Consideration. Before Judge HlLLYER. Clayton Superior Court. March Term, 1879. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Crawford, Justice.
1. The first question made by the record in this case is, whether a fertilizer known as Stonewall No. 1, which was imported in casks or barrels and legally analysed and inspected under the laws of Georgia, and then taken from their original packages, manipulated with land plaster and other ingredients, then sacked and sold without further analysis or inspection, falls under the prohibitory law of 1874?
The act declares “That it shall not be lawful to sell, or offer for sale, any fertilizer manufactured in this state, or to bring into the state for sale and distribution, any…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Perkins v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Cunningham v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Swank v. MoisanOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Conley v. Sims & BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Beecher v. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.