Cain v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm Appellant’s ' judgment and sentence for sale or delivery of cocaine, but based on thé state’s proper concession of error in response to our Harrison or'der,1 we reverse the imposition of the $100 cost for the FDLE Operating Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.055, Florida Statutes, and the .$100 sheriffs investigative cost pursuant to section 938.27. The trial court did not orally pronounce these costs at the sentencing hearing. See Nix v. State, 84 So.3d 424, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012),
On remand, the trial court may reimpose the FDLE Operating Trust Fund cost after following the proper…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Harrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Maria Eileen Bratton v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montanez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Montanez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019