Legal Opinion

in the Matter of James Arthur Cheek

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1991No. 23308Published

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter. The hearing panel and the Executive Committee found respondent advanced a position merely to harass or maliciously injure another and improperly disclosed the existence of a grievance complaint in violation of Rule 20 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure.1 We concur in these findings and conclude the appropriate sanction is a public reprimand and restitution.

The findings of misconduct arose from the following matters. In October 1986, attorney Cheryl Aaron instituted a civil lawsuit on behalf of a client who alleged respondent’s client had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Texas Co. v. C.W. Brewer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Redfearn v. PusserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API