Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Carnation Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7915SC1120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendants have failed to comply with App. R 28(b)(3). Neither the assignments of error nor the exception pertinent to defendant’s argument is set forth in the appellate brief. “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief ... will be taken as abandoned.” App. R. 28(b)(3). The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. Craver v. Craver, 298 N.C. 231, 258 S.E. 2d 357 (1979); Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126 (1930); State v. Brown, 42 N.C. App. 724, 257 S.E. 2d 668 (1979), disc. rev. denied, cert. granted, 299 N.C. 123 (1980).

For failing to comply with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re MageeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API