People v. Contreras
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, J.
A deputy district attorney declined to go forward at a suppression hearing after the superior court refused to require the defendant to prove standing before taking evidence on the reasonableness of a warrant-less search and seizure. The court then granted the motion to suppress and dismissed when the prosecution indicated it could not go forward at trial. Although we agree the order of proof is a judicial prerogative, the court should have done no more than determine that the district attorney had failed to justify the warrantless search. The defendant should then have been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- People v. BouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.