Ford v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.
Kenneth Ford appeals his conviction for trafficking in illegal drugs. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial based on the prosecutor’s impermissible closing argument, we reverse.
In this one-day trial, a total of four witnesses were called in the State’s case. A confidential informant, two law enforcement officers, and a forensic chemist testified. Of the four witnesses, only the confidential informant was an eyewitness to the drug transaction.
The State’s case turned primarily on the credibility of the confidential informant who testified…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Coolen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Katherine Farris v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025