Legal Opinion

Jones v. Head

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1938No. 12202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.,

Counsel for the plaintiff insists that the suit can be maintained on two grounds: First, that this is a proceeding in equity seeking relief from void processes issued by the ordinary as ex-officio clerk of the court of ordinary, for cancellation of void process and fi. fa., and for an injunction against further procedure thereon by such ex-officio clerk. Second, the petition seeks a settlement in a court of equity under authority of the Code, § 113-2203, which provides that “A court of equity shall have concurrent juris*860diction with the ordinary over the settlement of accounts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Morrison v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Wadhams Oil Co. v. Tracy, State Supervisor of Inspectors of Illuminating OilsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Williams v. LancasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Hoffman v. ChesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Galloway v. Mitchell County Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Morris v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API