Legal Opinion

Wagenhurst v. Wineland

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 25, 1903No. 1310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Hearing! cm am appeal by tbe defendants from a decree of tbe Supreme Court of tbe District of Columbia in a suit to determine the ownership of funds on deposit with tbe Treasurer of tbe United States. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alvey

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court:

This appeal is from a decree of tbe supreme court of tbe District of Columbia. Tbe bill was filed by tbe appellee, Elias Wineland, to establish bis ownership of certain moneys or funds on deposit in tbe Treasury of the United States, as against tbe appellants, Ellwood 0. Wagenhurst, John E. Eeyburn, and John K. Little, adverse claimants of said funds. Decree is also sought against Eobert M. Moore and Ellis H. Eoberts, tbe latter being tbe Treasurer of tbe United States, and ex officio commissioner of tbe sinking fund of tbe District of Columbia, and *358as such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. NeedleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Scholl v. TibbsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API