Haight v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Willis G. Sears, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries which it is alleged were caused by the sudden and negligent starting of a street car in the city of Omaha while the plaintiff' was in the act of alighting therefrom. The jury returned a verdict for defendant.. Plaintiff appeals.
*294Two reasons are urged for tlie reversal of the case: (1) That the verdict is not supported by the evidence; (2) that the jury which tried the case was illegally constituted.
As to the first point: Plaintiff’s testimony was to the effect that, when the car stopped at Yates street, three passengers left the car in front…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Clawson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Turley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Embry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Reed v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spivey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Morgan v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Haight v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915