Legal Opinion
Home & City Savings Bank v. Rose Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered March 11, 1991 in Albany County, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion and cross motion in action Nos. 1 and 2 for summary judgment dismissing the complaints.
Defendants Rose Associates I, L.P. (a Delaware limited partnership) and HCBC, Inc. (a Delaware corporation), were formed for the purpose of investing in and/or acquiring plaintiff Home & City Savings Bank (hereinafter plaintiff). Shortly after their formation, defendants purchased 9.9% of the outstanding shares of plaintiff. Following several unsuccessful attempts by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Fifty States Management Corp. v. Niagara Permanent Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Canterbury Realty & Equipment Corp. v. Poughkeepsie Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Heffernan v. Colonie Country Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Slutzky v. Aron Estates Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1993
- Fourth Branch Associates Mechanicville v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003